Motivation - Why |
Over the years, I have had to study various topics, for business, for academic interest, or just for fun. This page collects some of these thoughts together in a semi chronological order. Parts of these texts may have lost their point already. But even so, they still reflect the world at the time of writing. |
Prologue - How it all started |
After
20 years in business, I realized that I know far too little on
far too few important topics. Something had to be done.
Especially the mental trauma caused the the fall of Nokia's
Mobile Phone business forced me to stop and think. |
Chapter 1 - System Intelligence ? |
I had the privilege to participate two excellent courses in the good old Helsinki University of Technology, before it was merged with two other Universities to become the fabulous new Aalto University. The first of the courses made me write an introduction textbased on my own experiences as a system design engineer and business leader. In Finnish the question is Ohjaako Insinooria Systeemiajattelu |
Chapter 2 - System Intelligence ! |
The second course made me to draft an analysis of a "Small World" phenomenon where a specific type of system intelligence dominates all the behavior and dynamics, in Finnish Systeemialykas Pieni Maailma.
This
writing has been published in the book Systeemialy
2005, edited by Esa Saarinen and Raimo P. Hamalainen
|
Chapter 3 - Basic Technologies |
During my earlyPhD studies, I spent some time with specific policy, technical and marketing issues, such as The DVB:H study was a result of a collaborative project and team effort of four plus one. Thank you Toivo, Teemu, Tero and Matti for good work and interesting discussions. These study papers used to be openly available on the HUT server but now it is Aalto time and such old data has been deleted there. Therefore I re-publish them here. |
Chapter 4 - Leaning forward |
The Book includes 6 journal and conference papers which are not available for free. The manuscripts are available in here ( for free :-). 1. The first one is a developed version of a learning project, focusing on Push of Cellular service, a.k.a.PoC. This effort was strongly encouraged by Sakari and it took me as far as to Sydney, Australia to present this in a Conference. Thank you Sakkefor pushing this forward. 2. And then I spent some interesting timeon Systems thinking applied to Wireless Access with Thomas. 3. The next paper focused on Mobility as a Service one more case study, also with Thomas. This paper provided me a very good excuse to travel to Hawaii, to HICSS 48. 4. and another MaaS paper where Ville joined the effort. Thank you Thomas and Ville for these joint achievements. 5. To gain some quantitative data we run some modelling related to Spectrum regulation, again with Thomas. 6. And finally I worked hard (alone) on Collaboration in Standardization. I think this paper most likely is the most important piece of work I have done in this space. The paper was further developed, marginally but still, and then incorporated into a book. Here is the last version of the book chapter. |
Chapter B |
The last leg of the journey was the public defense of the Dissertation, where the first salvo is the defendant's Lectio Praecursoria |
The Book - That's Why |
If it ever occursto me to think whether there are any priorities in my doings, I would tend to think that the Doctoral Dissertation, after all, is my most important consolidated wrinting, so far. The book is available on Aalto University web sitebut it may be a bit difficult to find. Ladies and gentlemen, The Book |
Chapter B+1 |
The
journey until here, however, encouraged me to continue. The next
trip I jumped in wasto
the world of Ecosystems
and Innovations with Jarkko. Thank you Jarkko. This is
currently the most popular of all these papers I have been
involved with. |
Chapter B+2 |
Standardization keeps on haunting me. I came across two very thoughtful lads, Jussi and Julius and we decided to write some papers on Standardization. Jussin ja Juliuksen kanssa tehtiin kaksi minun mielesta kiinnostavaa katsausta. Heidan kansantaloustieteellinen nakemys oli minulle kokonaan uutta asiaa ja siksi hyvin kiinnostavaa. Suomeksi kirjailtiin Standardisoinnista ja taloustieteesta joka julkaistiin Kansantaloudellisessa Aikakauskirjassa. Then Jussi found out that Standardization has not been studied much at all recently by the top economists . Therefore we wrote in English on the current state of standards related research in economics Connecting the dots. This paper was published in the International Journal of Standardization Research (IJSR) in 2021 This same great team focused also to relationship between General Purpose Technologies and standardization. The linkage is important since standardization aspects provide possibility to better evaluate technologies and their general purpose nature. This paper was published in the Telecommunications Policy which some people consider a bit higher level journal than any of the earlier papers. |
Chapter B+3 |
I have been walking and talking is various other(mine) fields, too,not only academic. As one outcome, I was asked to write some thoughts on Open Data and Open Innovation. Yearbook of the European Commission related activities.You need to browse to page B35 to find my writing. I wanted to define some shades of grey to the very general discussion on Trust. In Finland we talk about trust as our strength but I think we need to be more specific what kind of trust we are taking about. And of course, All the other writings in the Yearbookare very good, too :-) |
Luku B+4 |
Sitten
piti kirjoittaa viela jotain
aiheesta Data.
Vaikka meilla suomenkielessa ei
oikein ole edes kunnollista sanaa sille. Ehkapa juuri
siita syysta pitaakin
kirjoittaa. Kirjoitus liittyi maan hallituksen antamaan
tietopoliittiseen selontekoon, projektiin, jossa sain olla
mukana. |
Chapter B+5 |
Some time ago I had an opportunity to participate adialogue in ETSI to explore the future of standardization, including and especially from the perspective of data economy. The Task Force created a report where I had provided somecontributionfor the future of data related standards. The complete deliverable, as a result of the team work is in the form of a report: ETSI TFBR report. |
Chapter B+6 |
in 2021 I was tasked to create a course in Aalto University on Innovation Leadership, Compatibility and Standardization. It became obvious that higher level understanding on how to use standardization as a tool is rather thin in Finland. We have reasonable training available on how to utilize existing standards but my intention is to go beyond. The course is available in the form of 12 hours of video lectures and some additional material. The course is intended to all Master's and post graduate students and possibly also to all Aalto Alumni folks, too.
As
an extra outcome of this course two conference papers where
published in EURAS conference in 2023 and 2024. The later paper
was a joint effort ofAna
Paula Gonzalez-Torres and me. She is interested in ethics, AI
and how to use standards to solve some key issues of today. I
found this perspective very topical now when Europe is heading
to implement strong regulation for data economy.The
conference paper Governing
Through Standards: Artificial Intelligence and Values is the
first outcome. We developed the idea further in our research.
The upgraded paper was published in the Journal of Ethics and
Information Technology, title of our paper is AI
regulation: maintaining interoperability through value-sensitive
standardisation. |
| |
|
Chapter B+7 |
Over the years I have had many lectures in various locations and forums. In practise all these presentations have the system thinking framework applied to the case people are considering. Just to get started, I post here a link to a conference where I had a key note on 5G and new ecosystems Here is another presentation on data economy and ecosystems with the specific perspective on How to organize road traffic in the future. When the Mobile Communications is evolving further, it may be of soma value to take a systemic deep dive and see what has happen and what may happen next. It is very interesting to note that Mobile Communication used to be a self standing ecosystem of its own. But today it is more and more tightly coupled with the applications and services running of the top of the network layer. Aalto and ETLA have had a research project on this very topic and in this context I created a draft paper, open for comments, to examine the past in order to drive the future. Systemic model of Mobile Communications aims to address issues beyond its title. |
Chapter B+8 |
One
specific project in my later life has been the membership in SFS
Standardointilautakunta, Technical
Board on Standardization which approves the general principles
and procedures of standardization work. In addition, the
Technical Board approves national standards that are developed
in Finland. The work in the SR315 is very practical where the experts provide all the content. This work is very valuable particularly now when the EU has implemented the AI Act, regulations for use of AI in high risk applications. In this context, Alpo Varri and I provided an overviewof this work as it stands today (in 2024) in publication of Matemaattis-luonnontieteellisten alojen Akateemiset ry (MAL), with the title Standardointi lievittaa huolta tekoalysta. One more deliverable in this stream is a presentation to motivate people to look at the standards as one way to interpret the legal text in regulations using technical and operational definitions, which may be easier for engineers and business leaders to understand than the legal text of directives and acts etc.In this presenation I present also some higher level reasoning to take AI and the overall digital transformation as a opportunity for better life. Standardoinnista Valjaat Tekalylle Standardointi voi olla myos tehokas valine osana yrityksen tai organisaation strategiaa. Mitenkaan tyhjentavsti en tietenkaan tallaisesta yhdessa esityksessa pysty kertomaan. Mutta jonkinlainen tiivistys Aallon kurssista, josta jo kerroin tuolla ylempana tamakin esitys voi olla.Pidin taman esityksen SFS:n sisaisessa tilasuudessa, Standardointi Strategian valineena. |
Chapter B+9 |
TBD |
Chapter B+N |
Ja lopuksi kait voi heittayytya kokonaan vapaalle, istua kannon nokkaan pohtimaan menneisyytta. Sita voi tehda myos itseaan tutkiskellen. MAL: Kohtalona Nokia kts. sivu 15.. tai yhdessa muiden kanssa... Juuso Pekkinen kyselee..kaikenlaista Joukolta ja minulta.
..
tai menna viela
kauemmaksi historiaan ja katsoa mitaon
tullut tehdyksi teekkarina, kuten suunniteltu
suodattimia. Kenet kerran mukaansa temmannut... |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
In case you happen to have related pictures, I'm very happy to receive those !
.. with history and memories
These pages are manually designed by Timo Ali-Vehmas, Last update 10.3.2026
This page has been visited by a number of people since the counter was activated 10.3.2026
Visitor count: 74
Copyright by Timo Ali-Vehmas.